View source

{{redlink}}

{{Wikipedia|Real-time_tactics}}

[[Image:Medieval Total War - poised for battle.jpg|thumb|300px|Crusader army assembled for battle in ''[[Medieval: Total War]]''.]] 

'''Real-time tactics''' ('''RTT'''<ref name=splanet>{{cite web | title =Point - CounterPoint: Resource Collection vs. Fixed Units | publisher =StrategyPlanet | url =http://www.strategyplanet.com/features/articles/pcp-resources/ | format =HTML | accessdate =November 4, 2007  }}</ref>) is a [[Video game|computer game]] genre of [[tactical wargames]] that simulates the considerations and circumstances of [[operational warfare]] and [[military tactics]], as opposed to the more strategic considerations of [[real-time strategy]] (RTS) games. The RTT genre is less commonly called '''military strategy''' or '''real-time combat simulator'''.

==Characteristics==

[[Image:Sid Meier's Antietam! - Piper House.jpg|thumb|Archetypal example of real-time the tactical gameplay model (in this case a recreated [[American Civil War]] battle from ''[[Sid Meier's Antietam!]])''.]]

Real-time tactical gameplay is characterized by the expectation of players to complete their tasks using only the combat forces provided to them<ref name=splanet/><ref name=gspystrategy2>{{cite web | last =Walker | first =Mark | title =Strategy Gaming: Part II | publisher =[[GameSpy]] | url =http://archive.gamespy.com/articles/february02/strategy02/ | format =HTML | accessdate =October 28, 2007  }}</ref>, and usually by the provision of a realistic (or at least believable) representation of military tactics and operations. This contrasts with other current wargame genres: for instance, in large-scale [[turn-based strategy]] games battles are generally abstracted and the gameplay close to that of related board games, and [[real-time strategy]] games de-emphasize realism and focus on the collection and conversion of resources into production capacities which manufacture combat units thereafter used in generally highly stylised confrontations. In contrast, real-time tactics games' military tactical and realistic focus and comparatively short risk/reward cycle<ref name=rrc>In computer and video games, the risk/reward cycle, or risk/reward schedule, is a gameplay consequence of the game model and game design. The risk/reward cycle is the distance between the core mechanics and the end purpose of a game. For instance, the purpose of real-time strategy games is the military conquest of the opponents on the map or in the mission, which is done by harvesting resources, building bases and producing units, which means that in general the player will spend 80% of his gaming time on repetitive core game mechanics and only the residual 20% of his time on the military confrontation. See Source [http://lostgarden.com/2005/04/practical-definition-of-innovation-in.html A Practical Definition of Innovation in Game Design]</ref> usually provide a distinctly more immediate, intense and accessible experience of battlefield tactics and [[mêlée]] than strategy games of other genres.

As suggested by the genre's name, also fundamental to real-time tactics is [[real-time]] gameplay. The genre has its roots in [[tactical wargames|tactical]] and [[miniature wargaming|miniature]] [[wargaming]], the recreation of battle scenarios using [[miniatures]] or even simple paper chits. These board and table-top games were out of necessity [[turn-based]]: Only with computer support was turn-based  play and strategy successfully transposed into real-time. [[Turn-based strategy]] and [[turn-based tactics]]  were obvious candidates for computer implementation. As computer implementation eventually allowed for ever more complex rulesets, some games became less timeslice-focused and more continuous until eventually "realtime" play was achieved.

Compared to other strategy games, games of the real-time tactics genre often have distinctly detailed and complex environments due to the tactical implications of elevation, hard cover and true [[Line of sight (gaming)|line of sight]]. Due to the demands of realism units in real-time tactical games also often have a significant degree of autonomy over their actions within the context of their orders compared to the relatively or fully passive units of other strategy genres (e.g. units in ''[[MechCommander 2]]'' are remarkably autonomous).

Further, in many real-time tactics games a player's force is maintained between battles. This allows units to become more proficient as they gain more battle experience and can even encourage an affinity between the player and his or her troops, breaking down the stereotypical anonymity of the expendable, mass-produced units found in strategic games. To this end [[Bungie Studios]]' ''[[Myth (computer game)|Myth]]'' series gave each soldier a unique name, and in ''[[Warhammer: Shadow of the Horned Rat]]'' and ''[[Warhammer: Dark Omen]]'' units were individually named and under the leadership of their own captains with  distinct visual and vocal feedback.

==Genre classification debate==

The genre classification of real-time military computer games has been, and to a limited extent still remains, a topic of dispute. Real-time tactics often sees its games categorised as exemplars of the more popular, well-populated, and thus recognisable ''real-time strategy'' (RTS) genre. This has been a source of dispute between two principal camps: those who argue [[Lexicography|lexicographically]] that all games of military or strategic nature that are played in real-time are "real-time strategy" games; and those who argue that "real-time tactics" titles display enough fundamental and consistent differences from other related or established genres to make it unique.

It is worthwhile comparing the real-time tactics template to that of real-time strategy: Using the common definition, Real-time strategy games are characterised by the fact that the player exerts direct control over individual units, resource gathering, base and unit construction and technology development, micro-managing a complete albeit stylised production economy, as well as a likewise generally simplified and stylised combat model that generally bears little resemblance to actual military tactics. Thus, real-time strategy titles generally encourage the player to focus on logistics and production as much as or more than combat. In fact, as much as 80% of active gaming time can be spent on non-combat gameplay aspects,<ref name=lostgarden>{{cite web | url=http://lostgarden.com/2005/04/practical-definition-of-innovation-in.html | title= A practical definition of innovation in game design | accessmonthday=September 3 | accessyear=2006 }}</ref> whereas real-time tactics games, in their pure form, do not feature resource-gathering, production, base-building or economic management<ref name=gspystrategy2/>, instead focusing on tactical and operational aspects of warfare such as unit formations or the exploitation of terrain for tactical advantage. The expectation of players to finish an engagement with set resources radically veers gameplay away from the standard real-time strategy form.

This debate can be argued to be part of a greater lack of definition of genres. Various games of distinct and recognised genres, such as [[SimCity]] (which is a [[city-building game]]) and [[Railroad Tycoon]] (an [[economic simulation game]]), have recurringly been classified as "real-time strategy" for being more-or-less in real-time and of a strategic nature.<ref name="avault_deadlink">[http://www.avault.com/reviews/review_temp.asp?game=rt2&page=1]</ref><ref name=nrl>{{cite paper | author =David W. Aha & Matthew Molineaux | title =Integrating Learning in Interactive Gaming Simulators | publisher =[[SimBionic]] | date =July 25, 2004 | url =http://www.simbionic.com/gameai/papers/AAAI04-WS4-Aha.ppt | format =PowerPoint | accessdate = 2007-12-09}}</ref><ref name=gspot_meier>{{cite web | last =Coleman | first =Terry | date=December 31, 1998 | title =The Sid Meier Legacy | publisher =[[GameSpot]] | url =http://www.gamespot.com/features/sidlegacy/index.html | format =HTML | accessdate =2007-12-09  }}</ref> The difficulty of keeping up with genres and opinions has been recognised in some quarters: the Swedish arm of games magazine franchise ''[[PC Gamer]]'' generally use only the genre denomination "strategy" to refer to games of RTT, RTS or similar genres. {{Fact|date=February 2007}}

Relatively few developers or publishers use the terms "RTT" or "real-time tactics" in marketing, though one example is [[Massive Entertainment]], which explicitly described its game ''[[Ground Control II: Operation Exodus]]'' as real-time tactics rather than a real-time strategy title<ref name="rtt-used-by-massive">{{cite web|url=http://pc.gamezone.com/news/04_30_04_08_37AM.htm|title=Tactical Combat and an Ongoing Online Experience are the focus of “Ground Control II”|work=[[Gamezone]]|date=|accessdaymonth=16 December |accessyear=2006}}([[Massive Entertainment]]'s Henrik Sebring, lead developer for [[Ground Control II: Operation Exodus]], describes the game as real-time tactics)</ref> (which is ironic in that the title veered toward a real-time strategy mode by introducing resources and in-battle reinforcements unlike its predecessor); David Heart of [[Matrix Games]] describes the ''Close Combat'' series as "the overall tone emphasized realism, and modelled the emotional state of the units under your command, including panic, desertion, and surrender. Close Combat was never an RTS in the classic sense since resource gathering and other typical factors played no part in the game. Close Combat was far more of a tactical simulation and would be better described as a RTTS (Real Time Tactical Simulation)"<ref name="rtt-used-by-matrix">{{cite web|url=http://www.armchairgeneral.com/articles.php?p=2992&page=1&cat=59|title=Interview: Close Combat Series Redux|work=armchairgeneral|date=|accessdaymonth=19 March |accessyear=2007}}</ref> and f.i. ''[[Close Combat: Modern Tactics]]'' is sold as a "real time tactical warfare" game on their site<ref name="matrix-ccmt">{{cite web|url="http://www.matrixgames.com/games/game.asp?gid=350|title=Close Combat - Modern Tactics|work=[[Matrix Games]]|date=|accessdaymonth=13 January|accessyear=2008}}</ref>; and [[Namco Bandai Games|Namco Bandai]] announced the "Battle March" expansion to their 2006 title ''[[Warhammer: Mark of Chaos]]'' as "tactical real-time".<ref name="namcobandai-pressrelease">{{cite web|url=http://www.namcobandaigames.com/news/press/press/237/page/1|title=Namco Bandai Games press release for Warhammer: Battle March|work=www.namcobandaigames.com|date=|accessdaymonth=22 August|accessyear=2007}}</ref> While some publications do specify "RTT",<ref name="rtt-used-in-review">{{cite web|url=http://www.eurogamer.net/article.php?article_id=70245|title=Review - Warhammer: Mark Of Chaos|work=[[Eurogamer]]|date=23 November 2006|accessdaymonth=23 November |accessyear=2006}} (Review of [[Warhammer: Mark of Chaos]] explicitly calling the game a "RTT" as compared to a "RTS" game and discussing the difference)</ref><sup>,</sup><ref name="rtt-specified">{{cite web|url=http://gaming.hexus.net/content/item.php?item=6251|title=Exclusive : Warhammer Mark Of Chaos: How is the RTS game shaping up?|work=[[HEXUS]] gaming|date=24 July 2006|accessdaymonth=2 September |accessyear=2006}} (uses "strategy game", "real-time strategy", and "real-time tactics" in the same article)</ref><sup>,</sup><ref name="ign-stateoftherts">{{cite web|url=http://pc.ign.com/articles/700/700747p3.html|title=The State of the RTS|work=[[IGN]]|date=7 April 2006|accessdaymonth=14 September |accessyear=2006}}(Article at IGN discussing their perception of RTS and related genres as of 2006. RTT is discussed as a new and not yet established genre from the publisher's perspective.)</ref> others simply do not know to separate the terms: awareness of real-time tactics' distinct existence remains relatively low though as of late 2006 the term is increasingly appearing in various media. Nonetheless, the need to make a distinction from the "RTS" denomination is frequent and various neologies can be seen; titles of the genre has been described as "real-time combat simulators" and "military strategy" games, ''[[Nexus: The Jupiter Incident]]'' was called a "tactical fleet simulator" by its developers, and ''[[Blitzkrieg II]]'' was somewhat verbosely called a "real time simulator of WWII battles on company regimental level" rather than "real-time strategy" in a review.<ref name="stratinfobkii">{{cite web|url=http://www.strategyinformer.com/pc/blitzkriegii/review.html|title=Blitzkrieg II Review|work=Strategyinformer|date=4 November 2006|accessdaymonth=4 November |accessyear=2006}} (Review of ''Blitzkrieg II'' as an example of intentially and obviously avoiding the real-time strategy.)</ref>

==Brief history and background==
{{see|Chronology of real-time tactics video games}}
[[Image:Legionnaire startup.png|right|thumb|1982: Main screen from ''[[Legionnaire (computer game)|Legionnaire]]''.]]
[[Image:Centurion-Defender of Rome.gif|right|thumb|1990: Battle screen from ''Centurion: Defender of Rome''.]]
[[Image:FoG - Waterloo.gif|right|thumb|1993: The [[Battle of Waterloo]] unfolding in ''[[Fields of Glory]]''.]]
[[Image:WHSHR-Screen2.png|thumb|right|1995: Battlefield scene from ''[[Warhammer: Shadow of the Horned Rat]]''.]]
[[Image:Myth The Fallen Lords screenshot.jpg|thumb|right|1997: Confrontation in ''[[Myth: The Fallen Lords]]''.]][[Image:WHDO-day.jpg|thumb|1998: A cavalry charge in ''[[Warhammer: Dark Omen]]''.]]

Wargaming with items or figurines representing soldiers or units for training or entertainment has been common for as long as organised conflicts: [[Chess]], for example, is based on essentialised battlefield movements of medieval unit types and, beyond its entertainment value, is intended to instill in players a rudimentary sense of tactical considerations. Today, [[miniature wargaming]], where players mount armies of [[Miniature figure|miniature figurines]] to battle each other, has become popular (e.g., [[Warhammer Fantasy Battle]] and [[Warhammer 40000]]). Though similar to conventional modern board wargames (e.g. [[Axis & Allies]]), in the sense of simulating war and being [[turn-based]], the rules for miniature wargames tend to lean heavily towards the minutiae of military combat rather than anything at a strategic scale.

Though popular as table-top games, tactical wargames were relatively late in coming to computers, largely due to game mechanics calling for large numbers of units and individual soldiers, as well as advanced rules that would have required hardware capacities and interface designs beyond the capabilities of older hardware and software. Since most established rule sets were for turn-based table-top games, the conceptual leap to translate these categories to real-time was also a problem that required time to overcome.

[[Avalon Hill]]'s 1982 release ''[[Legionnaire (computer game)|Legionaire]]'' for the [[Atari 8-bit family|Atari 8-bit]] was a real-time wargame of Romans versus Barbarians which, while featuring constrained tactical diversity, can be argued to qualify as an early real-time tactics game. Likewise, [[Free Fall Associates]]' 1983 title ''[[Archon (computer game)|Archon]]'' can be considered an early real-time tactics game, built upon Chess but including real-time battle sequences. Archon was highly influential, and, for instance, [[Silicon Knights|Silicon Knights, Inc.]]'s [[1994]] game ''[[Dark Legions]]'' was virtually identical to it, adding only to ''Archon'''s concept that the player, as in many table-top wargames, purchases his army before committing to battle. Another predecessor was Bits of Magic's ''[[Centurion: Defender of Rome]]'' (published for the [[personal computer|PC]] by [[Electronic Arts]] in 1990), in which, similar to the recent ''[[Rome: Total War]]'' game, the game took place on a strategic map interspersed by battle sequences. However, though the battles were in real-time they were of small scope and player interaction was limited to deciding the initial troop disposition. 

===Establishing the genre: the late-nineties rise in popularity===
Perhaps the first game that can be recognised as a qualified exemplar of the real-time tactics genre was ''[[Fields of Glory]]'', released in [[1993]] by [[MicroProse]]. The game was a purely real-time tactical wargame that attempted to realistically recreate several of the major battles of [[Napoleon Bonaparte|Napoleon Bonaparte's]] Waterloo campaign. Though meticulous and ambitious it suffered from the low-resolution graphics of the day and had to compromise with the visual presentation of its large-scale battles and abstracted away low-level battlefield aspects.

Around [[1995]], however, computer hardware and developer support systems had developed enough to facilitate the requirements of large-scale real-time tactical games. It was in 1995 that the regimentally focused wargame ''[[Warhammer: Shadow of the Horned Rat]]'' was released, groundbreaking not only in that it focused purely on the operational aspects of combat (with all aspects pertaining: regimental manoeuvring and formations, support tactics, terrain, etc.), nor only in that it was entirely real-time, but also that it introduced zoomable and rotatable 3D terrain. In 1997 [[Firaxis Games]]' released ''[[Sid Meier's Gettysburg!]]'', a detailed and faithful recreation of some of the most significant battles of the [[American Civil War]] that introduced large scale tactical battlefield command using 3D.

3D visuals only became established in the real-time strategy genre around eight years after their advent in real-time tactics; it could be argued that the nature of real-time tactics games and the genre's focus lends more naturally to 3D representation, for instance to check [[Line of sight (gaming)|line of sight]], while the faster pace, rapid-click, highly stylized nature of real-time strategy games were better presented in 2D. Real-time tactics games need not be in 3D however: the ''[[Close Combat series|Close Combat]]'' series as well as ''[[Sudden Strike]]'', both successful titles, functioned in two dimensions. Released in [[1996]] by [[Atomic Games]], ''Close Combat'' is a simulation of squad- and platoon-type [[World War II]] combat tactics which introduced a higher degree of operational realism than seen before. Further, as ''Warhammer: Shadow of the Horned Rat'' was a translation of the [[Warhammer Fantasy Battle]] table-top system, [[FASA|FASA Studios]]' ''[[MechCommander]]'' from 1998 was a translation of the [[BattleTech]] boardgame into a 2D computer game format.

In [[1997]], [[Bungie]] released ''[[Myth (computer game)|Myth]]'', which introduced radically larger battlefields than ever before, and in [[2000]], [[Creative Assembly]] created ''[[Shogun: Total War]]'' taking map sizes even further as well as introducing historical and tactical realism on levels until then unheard of in real-time computer games. ''[[Ground Control]]'' was also released in 2000, gaining much attention for its luscious visuals but earning developers [[Massive Entertainment]] few sales.

===Eastern Europe===
Recent years have seen a slew of tactical simulators being developed in [[Eastern Europe]]. Examples include real-time tactics games such as the ''[[Blitzkrieg (computer game)|Blitzkrieg]]'' series, the ''[[Sudden Strike]]'' series, the ''[[UFO: Aftermath|UFO]]'' series by [[ALTAR Interactive]] (not to be confused with ''[[UFO: Enemy Unknown]]'' by [[Microprose]], the first title in the ''[[X-COM]]'' series), ''[[Nexus: The Jupiter Incident]]'', ''[[Joint Task Force (computer game)|Joint Task Force]]'', and ''[[Codename: Panzers]]'', as well as [[turn-based tactics]] games such as the ''[[Silent Storm]]'' series, ''[[UFO: Extraterrestrials]]'' (by [[Chaos Concept]]) and ''[[Jagged Alliance 3]]'' (currently in development). These sorts of games have been described as difficult to develop in the West.<ref name=rpgv>{{cite web | first =Jonric | title =Jagged Alliance 3 Interview | publisher =RPG Vault | date =October 16, 2007 | url =http://rpgvault.ign.com/articles/827/827659p1.html | format =HTML | accessdate =October 19, 2007 | quote =When choosing a team to develop a project of this type and scale, it was obvious that we needed Russian developers, the same people that created games with similarities to Jagged Alliance 2, both in genre and the time setting. I'm referring to releases like Silent Storm, Night Watch, Brigade E5 and others. Such projects have not been created in western countries for a long time, which can make development more difficult.  }}</ref>

==Archetypes==
===Historical and Contemporary settings===

[[Image:Rome Total War - Julii Storms City.jpg|thumb|right|Army-level antique-era real-time tactical game play (Roman mercenaries attack a village in ''[[Rome: Total War]]'').]]
[[Image:Faces of War.jpg|thumb|right|Brigade-level [[WWII]]-era action-focused real-time tactical game play (scene from ''[[Faces of War]]'').]]
[[Image:Fsw fragout.jpg|thumb|Unit-level modern-era action-focused real-time tactical game play (a US Infantryman throws a grenade between two hostiles in ''[[Full Spectrum Warrior: Ten Hammers]]'').]]
[[Image:WIC_screenshot.jpg|thumb|Brigade-level modern-era real-time tactical game play (tactical nuclear explosion in ''[[World In Conflict]]'').]]

Real-time tactics games with historical or contemporary settings generally try to recreate the tactical environment of their selected period, the most common eras and situations being the [[American Civil War]] and European [[Gunpowder warfare|Napoleonic warfare]], though [[ancient warfare]] and [[World War II]] settings are also common. Numerically they make up the bulk of the genre.

While the degree of realism is uniform, the scale of command and precise mechanics differ radically according to the period setting in keeping with the tactics of that period. So for instance, titles set in the [[Napoleonic Wars]] are played at a platoon level, with players controlling groups of sometimes hundreds of soldiers as a single unit, whereas recreations of modern conflicts (such as the [[Iraq War]]) tend to offer control down to squad or even individual level.

Examples:
*''[[Total War (video game series)|Total War]]'' series (by [[The Creative Assembly]]), exemplified by the first title, ''[[Shogun: Total War]]'' (2000) are widely-recognised examples of large-scale tactical recreations of battles. Units are organised and controlled in regiments, frequently of several hundred soldiers, and the games are built to encourage the use of authentic tactics. ''[[Rome: Total War]]'' (2004), has however been criticised for violating realism and several [[Mod (computer gaming)|mods]] have been made to correct this). Battles are freeform and generally take place in open country; there are no plotted side-missions like in the ''Warhammer'' games discussed below.
*''[[Sid Meier's Gettysburg!]]'' (1997) and its sequel ''[[Sid Meier's Antietam!]]'' (1998) (by [[Firaxis Games]]) set in the [[American Civil War]] are the most well known examples of Napoleonic style simulations. Common to these games is the recreation in detail and scale of a particular set of significant or well known battles. Using the same engine Firaxis and [[BreakAway Games]] also released ''[[Waterloo: Napoleon's Last Battle]]'' which recreates [[Napoleon Bonaparte]]'s last and most famous battle of 1815. Also noteworthy is ''[[Imperial Glory]]'' (2005) by [[Pyro Studios]] which recreates the multi-polar conflicts of Europe between 1789 and 1830. 
*The ''[[Close Combat series]]'' (1995–) (by [[Atomic Games]]) are tactical battle simulations set in [[World War II|WWII]] known for a very high degree of realism taking into account limited ammunition, severity of wounds and the psychology and mental welfare of individual soldiers. 
*[[TalonSoft|TalonSoft's]] ''[[Age of Sail]]'' (1996) and ''[[Age of Sail II]]'' (2001) are 3D naval real-time tactics games where you command sailing vessels in high sea and coastal battles. Beyond heading, aspects such as amount of sails and cannon ordinance can be ordered. 
*''[[Sudden Strike]]'' (2000) (by Fireglow Games). In contrast to the ''Close Combat'' series, this title focuses on larger-scale operations and mechanised tactics rather than low-level details. 
*''[[Faces of War]]'' (2006) ([[Ubisoft]]) is similar to ''Close Combat'' also being set in WWII. It offers individual units with greater autonomy as well as 3D graphics.
*''[[Full Spectrum Warrior]]'' series (2004–) (by [[Pandemic Studios]]) is set in a fictional country for all practical purposes identical to Iraq. The games revolve around a maximum of two squads of four soldiers each and offers engagements at a far more intimate level than the ''Total War'' series, and indeed the genre at large, and also emphasise story more than most real-time tactics titles. Despite a visual appearance similar to [[first person shooters]] the player does not directly control any character, instead only issuing orders to his troops and as such qualifies as a ''real-time tactical'' game. It is also distinct from the sub-genre of [[first person shooters]] known as [[tactical shooters]] that incorporate some tactical aspects, such as Ubisoft's [[Rainbow Six]] series or [[Gearbox Software]]'s Brother in Arms''). 
*''[[World In Conflict]]'' is based in 1989 as the [[Soviet Union]] invades Eastern Europe and the [[United States]] west coast to hold onto power when economic troubles threaten to cripple the country.
{{clear}}

===Fantastical settings===

[[Image:Mark of Chaos - Defending city.jpg|thumb|right|Empire forces defend a hamlet in ''[[Warhammer: Mark of Chaos]]'', a real-time tactical game cutting graphical edge in 2006.]]

While most ''fantasy'' titles bear some resemblance to a historical period (usually medieval), they also incorporate fictional creatures, areas, and/or magic and suffer from few historical constraints.

The leading [[High Fantasy]] real-time tactics games are ''[[Warhammer Fantasy Battle]]'' titles. The loose series began with one of the earliest mainstream real-time tactics games, ''[[Warhammer: Shadow of the Horned Rat]]'' (1995). While the games' depth of tactical simulation is similar to that of ''[[Total War (video game series)|Total War]]'' it leans towards skirmishes over epic battles and features both unique hero characters and a tightly authored story. The sequel ''[[Warhammer: Dark Omen]]'' (1998) refined these aspects into one of the most representative real-time tactics exemplars to date, but was misunderstood by the press as an incomplete real-time strategy game and largely overlooked at its release.{{Fact|date=March 2007}} The very influential video game ''[[Myth (computer game)|Myth: The Fallen Lords ]]'' (1997) emphasised formation cohesion less than the ''Warhammer'' games and introduced extensive maps. In 2006, ''[[Warhammer: Mark of Chaos]]'' was released; a game of similar kind to the two preceding ''Warhammer'' titles, but taking game play away from their realistic focus and fidelity to the ''Warhammer'' rules to a more [[Computer and video game genres#Arcade|arcade]]- and [[micromanagement]]-oriented form.

===Futuristic settings===

[[Image:Ground Control.jpg|thumb|A [[combined arms]] assault in ''[[Ground Control]]'', the first and defining exemplar of orthodox futuristic real-time tactical games.]]
[[Image:Nexus figherpatrol.jpg|thumb|Destroyer orbiting its carrier in ''[[Nexus: The Jupiter Incident]]'', a game characterised by a deep space fully 3D game area.]]

Games set in the future often combining elements of [[science fiction]] obviously are not constrained by historical accuracy or even limitations in current technology or physics. 

;[[Ground Control]]
:Its setting allowed innovative use of air units.
;[[Starship Troopers#Video and board games|Starship Troopers: Terran Ascendancy]]
:An action oriented game based on [[Robert A. Heinlein]]'s book ''[[Starship Troopers]]''. It is characteristic for the smaller and more autonomous units.
;[[MechCommander 2]]
:Notable for implementing a lightweight resource acquisition system without becoming an RTS. A player could earn 'Resource Points' during a mission, in addition to those awarded at the start, but they could only be expended on support tasks; save for repairs and plucky on-field salvage operations the system did not affect the player's combat force.
;[[Soldiers of Anarchy]]
:A post-apocalyptic, squad-level game which emphasised a realistic environment scale, vehicles, and scavenging in the aftermath of battles.
;[[Nexus: The Jupiter Incident]]
:Set in space, replacing as a result most genre conventions (not least of which terrain) with its own.

<!-- leave the following Clr template in place or the formatting of the images above might attenuate the chronology table -->
{{Clr}}


==See also==
*[[Chronology of real-time tactics video games]]
*[[List of military tactics]]
*[[Real-time strategy]]
*[[Strategy game]]
*[[Tactical role-playing game]]
*[[Tactical wargames]]
*[[Turn-based strategy]]
*[[Turn-based tactics]]
*[[War]]fare
*[[List of strategy video games]]

==References==
<div class="references-small">
<references />
</div>

==External links==
* [http://pc.ign.com/articles/700/700747p1.html The State of the RTS], [[IGN]], 2006
{{VideoGameGenre}}

[[Category:Video game genres]]
[[Category:Real-time tactics video games| ]]
[[Category:Wargames| ]]
[[Category:Computer wargames| ]]

[[et:Taktika reaalajas]]